Sunday, June 5, 2011

Part 2 Statement Analysis of Casey Anthony's Interview



    We pick up with Part II of Statement Analysis of Casey Anthony's words and see the plain pattern of her deception:  additional words.  She moves towards hyperbole with words like "exactly, precisely, absolutely" and so on.  


    She divides topics well with, "on the other hand" and "but at the same time", leaving room for a different lie.  The additional words she throws in comes without pre-meditation; in other words, it comes from her free editing process.  She is not so much pre-planning to lie, she is simply being herself, with her brain operating in less than a microsecond telling her tongue to lie. 


    Casey Anthony does not lie; Casey Anthony is a liar.  It is her "walk."  In Greek, there are 6 different words for "walk" with the one used often in Scripture meaning the 'habitual practice' or the 'norm footsteps' or patterns of which one walks in.  


    A person, for example, may walk in truth, and on exception, lie.  When they lie, they feel remorse for it and may seek to right the wrong.  This is not a "liar" but a person who has lied. 


    Casey is a liar.  This type of lying can and has been linked with murder.  Her life is a lie and remarkably, as Cindy Anthony (and George) sat in court while the jail house videos were being played, they heard her lie.


    How did they hear her lie?


    They heard her lie in such a manner that it may be that in all of her sentences, few, if any individual sentences were truthful. 


    In this sense, Casey Anthony is remarkable. 


    As my premise in Part I says, Casey is not a brilliant liar.  A brilliant liar would be one where the liar successfully deceives.  This is not Casey.  


    Objection:  She fooled her family and friends.


    Answer:  As to her "friends", we learned that they were only superficial friendships:  no one knew her for very long.  Her love interest was but a few months.  Those she called friends were all newer relationships. She is a superficial, surface only type, with no deep, long lasting relationships.  The only one she knew for 2 years called her a "diabolical" liar, which is an accurate term.


    As to her parents;  they knew but deliberately avoided confronting her no matter what the issue, until it climaxed when she stole from Cindy and Cindy wanted her car back, and, by calling the police on auto theft, she also reported her grandchild missing.    They lived in the self and willful deceptive state of denial. 


    They did not want to know. 


    They chose to believe in a phantom nanny, phantom job and phantom life.  


    They chose to praise her and describe her as a wonderful mother, financial planner, nurturer and 'mother' to her friends.  As she went from boyfriend to boyfriend without moral dignity, they did not question her. 


    Question:  How is it that a 19 year old can be pregnant, living in her parents' home and the parents not know it?


    Question:  How is it that a 19 year old can be pregnant, living in her parents' home, without them learning who the father is?  (no less, contacting the other family)


    Answer;:  They did not want to know. 


    It is like finding needles and drug paraphenalia in your only son's room, at age 16, and watching him wear a "just say no" t-shirt and telling their friends how wonderful their son is in his anti-drug stance. 


    The Anthonys were lied to because they taught her to lie and they wanted to be lied to.  For 3 years they did the same and now are testifying for the prosecution.  A big payday has apparently arrived, with a 2 million dollar deal from Lifetime movies, but we await to hear what happens when the Defense calls its own witnesses.

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: At what point did you stop trusting her?

    CASEY ANTHONY: The moment that her phone was cut off and I couldn`t get in contact with my daughter.

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: So you thought, Man, something ain`t right.

    CASEY ANTHONY: Something is wrong.


    This is an example of giving Casey answers.  What is the point?  See part 1 for a more complete explanation but suffice to say:  interviewers must never interrupt nor give words to the subject to use.  It reduces the stress of lying. 

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And when you started thinking that something was wrong, which police agency did you call first, us or the city police? Or who did you call first? Who did you go to first to help try to find her?


    compound questions allow the subject to pick and choose which question to answer and should be avoided.  The detectives are exhausted and frustrated. 
    CASEY ANTHONY: No one.

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No one. OK. All right. OK. Well, I`m glad we got that straightened out.




    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Did you talk to anyone about Caylee, about (INAUDIBLE) INAUDIBLE) Caylee, or about that she`s missing?

    CASEY ANTHONY: Outside of a couple of people, a couple of mutual friends.

    Here is Casey being Casey, using additional, unnecessary words.  It is a unique attribute of her, as a liar. 
    Who are the friends that are mutual with whom? Friends of her's and Caylee's?  Friends of her's and the police?
     She often speaks in illogical sentences. 
    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Who did you talk to about it?

    CASEY ANTHONY: I talked to Jeff, Jeffrey Hawkins.


    Note the name change:  Jeff, and then Jeffrey Hopkins (sic).  This continues the sensitivity of emphasis.  Casey believes that by giving additional information or repeating things she will be believed. 

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Who else did you talk to?

    CASEY ANTHONY: I talked to Juliet Lewis (ph). She`s one of my co- workers at Universal.

    Note she gives the name and then her relation, co-worker, and the place of work:  Universal.   Casey rarely gives an answer without additional information which seems to be a pattern of sensitivity for her

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: She works -- you still work at Universal?

    CASEY ANTHONY: Yes.

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: What do you do at Universal?

    CASEY ANTHONY: I`m an event coordinator.

    We know now that this is a flat out lie, yet she speaks in the present tense and uses the first person singular, indicating strength.  This means that this type of statement should be believed unless proven otherwise, which is what police had to do.  This type of lie is rare and although Casey is not a great liar, this is a 'strong lie'.  I tip my hat to her here.  She is not an event coordinator at Universal, but my guess is that Casey orchestrated or coordinated 'events' or get togethers by friends. 

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: OK. What does Julia -- what position does she

    CASEY ANTHONY: She`s also an event coordinator. We work in the same department.

    The question is what position.  Casey answers, but then must give additional information.  She was not asked what department Julia worked in.  This is the pattern. 

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You (INAUDIBLE) to Universal, where you said you were in an office to try to help find stuff that will help us find your daughter. (INAUDIBLE) so far, OK? And we get here, we get down to the hall, and they tell us you even don`t work here. You don`t have an office here.

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: until about two months ago

    CASEY ANTHONY: No, he hasn`t worked here for quite a while.

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Ten months? How long?

    CASEY ANTHONY: It`s been at least two months.

    Casey almost always gives descriptive words in her sentences.  She can't say "two months" but must attempt to persuade with "at least", as if there is some form of emotional connection with the person. Police were ready for her:

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: OK. He got fired in 2002. He hasn`t been an employee since 2002.

    Why not let her comment on this??

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: What about the girl?

    CASEY ANTHONY: Juliet?

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yes. What about her?

    CASEY ANTHONY: She left two months ago. That`s exactly what she...

    see previous analysis:  Casey uses "exactly" repeatedly.  

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Juliet Lewis never worked at Universal Studios.

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Our purpose of coming here was to do what? Go where?

    CASEY ANTHONY: I guess there wasn`t a purpose. There wasn`t a purpose whatsoever to come up here.

    Note the deception via extra words.  First she said "guess" which reduces commitment, but then, she continued to speak extra words but in these extra words we see the pattern of deception with words moving towards hyperbole:  "there wasn't a purpose" is not truthful:  there was a purpose:  it was to deceive and buy herself more time to think of lies which is why she adds in her favorite phraseology, instantly:  "whatsoever".  The additional word tells us, in Casey's pattern, lying is present.  This is Casey's pattern and should be viewed carefully.  Many statements use "whatsoever" and "exactly" and other such terms honestly; it is Casey's own method of deception where she seeks to persuade and act as if she is in "complete" agreement.  Note also how often Lee uses the same few phrases. 

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: So we`re wasting time, valuable time that ought to be spent looking for your daughter.

    UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Unless we start getting the truth -- unless we start getting the truth, we`re going to announce two possibilities with Caylee. Either you gave Caylee to someone and you don`t want anyone to find out because you think you`re a bad mom, or something happened to Caylee and Caylee`s buried somewhere or in a trash can somewhere, and you had something to do with it. Either way right now, it is not a very pretty picture to be painted.

    Source URL: https://wallpaper-com.blogspot.com/2011/06/part-2-statement-analysis-of-casey.html
    Visit wallpaper-com for Daily Updated Hairstyles Collection

No comments:

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

My Blog List

Blog Archive